Bert Base Arabic Camelbert Da Sentiment

🚀 CAMeLBERT-DA情感分析模型

CAMeLBERT-DA情感分析模型 是一個通過微調 CAMeLBERT方言阿拉伯語（DA） 模型而構建的情感分析（SA）模型。該模型在微調過程中使用了 ASTD、ArSAS 和 SemEval 數據集。我們的微調過程和所使用的超參數可以在論文 "阿拉伯語預訓練語言模型中變體、規模和任務類型的相互作用" 中找到。微調代碼可以在 此處 獲取。

🚀 快速開始

你可以直接將CAMeLBERT-DA情感分析模型作為 駱駝工具（CAMeL Tools） 情感分析組件的一部分使用（推薦），也可以將其作為transformers管道的一部分使用。

💻 使用示例

基礎用法

使用 駱駝工具（CAMeL Tools） 情感分析組件調用模型：

>>> from camel_tools.sentiment import SentimentAnalyzer
>>> sa = SentimentAnalyzer("CAMeL-Lab/bert-base-arabic-camelbert-da-sentiment")
>>> sentences = ['أنا بخير', 'أنا لست بخير']
>>> sa.predict(sentences)
>>> ['positive', 'negative']

高級用法

直接使用transformers管道調用情感分析模型：

>>> from transformers import pipeline
>>> sa = pipeline('text-classification', model='CAMeL-Lab/bert-base-arabic-camelbert-da-sentiment')
>>> sentences = ['أنا بخير', 'أنا لست بخير']
>>> sa(sentences)
[{'label': 'positive', 'score': 0.9616648554801941},
 {'label': 'negative', 'score': 0.9779177904129028}]

⚠️ 重要提示

若要下載我們的模型，你需要 transformers>=3.5.0。否則，你可以手動下載模型。

📚 詳細文檔

預期用途

你可以將CAMeLBERT-DA情感分析模型直接作為我們 駱駝工具（CAMeL Tools） 情感分析組件的一部分使用（推薦），也可以將其作為transformers管道的一部分使用。

📄 許可證

本項目採用Apache-2.0許可證。

📖 引用

如果你在研究中使用了該模型，請使用以下BibTeX引用：

@inproceedings{inoue-etal-2021-interplay,
    title = "The Interplay of Variant, Size, and Task Type in {A}rabic Pre-trained Language Models",
    author = "Inoue, Go  and
      Alhafni, Bashar  and
      Baimukan, Nurpeiis  and
      Bouamor, Houda  and
      Habash, Nizar",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the Sixth Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop",
    month = apr,
    year = "2021",
    address = "Kyiv, Ukraine (Online)",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    abstract = "In this paper, we explore the effects of language variants, data sizes, and fine-tuning task types in Arabic pre-trained language models. To do so, we build three pre-trained language models across three variants of Arabic: Modern Standard Arabic (MSA), dialectal Arabic, and classical Arabic, in addition to a fourth language model which is pre-trained on a mix of the three. We also examine the importance of pre-training data size by building additional models that are pre-trained on a scaled-down set of the MSA variant. We compare our different models to each other, as well as to eight publicly available models by fine-tuning them on five NLP tasks spanning 12 datasets. Our results suggest that the variant proximity of pre-training data to fine-tuning data is more important than the pre-training data size. We exploit this insight in defining an optimized system selection model for the studied tasks.",
}