Veritas 12B

🚀 Veritas-12B

Veritas-12B是一款致力于追求思想清晰和逻辑严谨的模型。这个拥有120亿参数的模型具备卓越的哲学推理能力和分析深度，非常适合用于探索复杂的伦理困境、解构论点以及进行结构化的哲学对话。Veritas-12B擅长阐述细微的立场、识别逻辑谬误，并构建基于理性的连贯论点。其讨论的特点是秉持学术诚信、进行批判性分析，并致力于精确地探索思想。

🚀 快速开始

Veritas-12B可直接用于哲学相关的文本生成任务，如分析哲学论点、探讨伦理问题等。你可以通过以下方式调用该模型：

# 示例代码，需根据实际情况调整
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer

model_name = "soob3123/Veritas-12B"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_name)

input_text = "请分析康德的道德哲学"
input_ids = tokenizer(input_text, return_tensors="pt").input_ids
output = model.generate(input_ids)
generated_text = tokenizer.decode(output[0], skip_special_tokens=True)
print(generated_text)

✨ 主要特性

• ⟡ 深度哲学探究：能够清晰且有条理地深入探索复杂概念、伦理框架和多元哲学传统。
• ⟡ 卓越逻辑一致性：在论证过程中严格遵循逻辑原则，识别不一致之处，并构建合理的思维链条。
• ⟡ 结构化论证分析：擅长解构复杂论证，评估前提和结论，并阐述精妙的批判或辩护观点。
• ⟡ 细微概念阐述：能够精确且诚实地呈现抽象思想、微妙区别和复杂的哲学术语。

⚠️ 限制与注意事项

⚠️ 重要提示

• 该模型在需要严谨分析、逻辑论证和哲学探索的场景中表现最佳，可能不适用于日常闲聊或纯粹的创意/情感表达。
• 由于其注重分析深度，对于一些简单问题，有时可能会给出过于正式、抽象或冗长的回答。
• 无审查模型：Veritas-12B是完全无审查的，可能会生成被认为具有冒犯性、有害、不道德或不适当的内容。用户应谨慎使用并自行判断。

📦 GGUFs

• Q4_0
  • 基于Gemma 3 12B QAT进行微调，Q4_0的性能预计与FP16相当。

💻 使用示例

基础用法

以下是一个使用Veritas-12B描述图像的示例：

Prompt :
![image/png](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/62f93f9477b722f1866398c2/Gi6bAoMHH-4IHxPHdfIOA.png)
Describe this image
### Base Gemma 3 12B
Okay, let's break down the likely meaning and context of this artwork.
What we see:
•	Dense Field of Dots: The primary element is a vast grid composed entirely of colorful dots. They are fairly uniform in size and spacing.
•	Man Gazing/Contemplating: A bald man, dressed casually (likely a jacket with a shoulder bag) stands facing the artwork. His posture suggests he's deeply engaged or lost in thought while viewing it.
•	Clean Background: The dots are on a plain white background which makes the dots pop and emphasizes their pattern.
The Artist & Context - Yayoi Kusama (Almost Certainly!)
This is overwhelmingly likely to be an artwork by Yayoi Kusama. She's world-famous for her obsession with patterns, particularly dots, and her installations often incorporate them on a massive scale.
Here’s what we can interpret from the meaning of this work within the context of Yayoi Kusama’s artistic practices:
Possible Meanings & Interpretations:
1.	Infinity and Obliteration: Kusama's art frequently explores themes of infinity, repetition, and a desire to "obliterate" the self or ego. The vast field of dots can be seen as representing this boundless nature of existence. It’s a visual embodiment of something that goes on forever, beyond human comprehension.
2.	Self-Obliteration/Merging with the Universe: Kusama has spoken about her personal experiences with mental health (including hallucinations) and how patterns help her cope. For her, covering surfaces in dots can be a way to escape from herself – to dissolve into the environment and merge with something larger than herself (the universe, nature, etc.). The man looking at the work might represent someone experiencing this process of introspection or transcendence.
3.	Pattern as Order/Chaos: Dots are simple shapes, but when multiplied in vast numbers, they can create a sense of order – a structured grid. However, the variety of colors and sheer density can also be overwhelming, suggesting chaos or an infinite array of possibilities. It’s the interplay between these two elements that Kusama often explores.
4.	The Power of Observation: The artwork encourages the viewer to really look. The dots are initially just a pattern, but the longer you gaze at it, the more nuances you might notice—different colors, subtle variations in size/spacing. This relates to her interest in perception and how our eyes/minds interpret visual information.
5.	The Individual vs. The Collective: The man standing before this immense display of dots represents an individual confronting something far larger than himself – the collective experience, the vastness of existence or a system beyond his control.
Overall Impression: This piece is evocative and contemplative. It's not about any specific narrative; it’s more about evoking feelings of awe, wonder, confusion, and perhaps even anxiety in the face of something immense and unknowable.

高级用法

以下是Veritas-12B对同一图像进行哲学解读的示例：

The artwork you’ve provided features a large-scale installation composed of numerous dots or circles arranged on what appears to be a white background. The varying colors suggest diversity and complexity while maintaining order through their repetition and pattern. This visual composition could evoke several philosophical interpretations, particularly drawing from the ideas of prominent philosophers such as Jean Baudrillard, Henri Bergson, and even some aspects of Kantian aesthetics.

1. Repetition and Meaning in Art (Henri Bergson)
French philosopher Henri Bergson emphasized duration—the continuous flow of time—as a fundamental aspect of experience. In this context, the repetition of circles might symbolize the idea that individual moments are part of an ongoing process or journey. Each dot could represent an instant or choice, collectively creating a narrative that resonates with life experiences. The artwork may encourage viewers to consider how these repeated elements accumulate into something meaningful over time—a metaphor for personal growth and identity formation as one navigates their own "duration."

2. Simulation Theory (Jean Baudrillard)
French theorist Jean Baudrillard, particularly in his work “Simulacra and Simulation,” argues that modern society has become so saturated with signs and images that reality is obscured by representations—simulations that do not correspond to an original or "real" state of affairs. The artwork could represent this concept; the dots might symbolize superficial layers of meaning that distract from deeper truths about existence. As the viewer stands before it, they are confronted with a pattern rather than substance—reflecting Baudrillard’s assertion that contemporary life is defined by hyperreality where media representations take precedence over actual lived experience.

3. The Aesthetic Experience (Immanuel Kant)
Drawing on Immanuel Kant's theory of aesthetics, the artwork could be seen as evoking pleasure through its arrangement and form rather than content. For Kant, aesthetic judgments involve a certain freedom from personal interests; thus, the viewer’s appreciation for the dots might stem more from their formal qualities—color combinations, symmetry, and repetition—rather than any narrative or symbolic representation they assign to them. The experience could be seen as transcendent, offering moments of pure aesthetic contemplation where one engages with beauty in a non-representational manner, aligning with Kant's notion that art can elevate human understanding beyond the constraints of practical considerations.

4. Individuality within Collective Identity
The presence of a solitary figure standing before this colorful background also invites reflection on individuality versus collective identity. This person might symbolize viewers grappling with their place in the vastness of existence, much like how we navigate social structures and personal narratives against larger patterns (like societal norms or cultural expectations). The dots may represent myriad possibilities, experiences, and identities that coexist but remain distinct—inviting us to ponder our own uniqueness within a framework of shared human experience.

In summary, this artwork can be interpreted through various philosophical lenses as it explores themes such as repetition, simulation, aesthetic appreciation, and individuality. By encouraging contemplation on these concepts, the piece engages viewers not only with its visual appeal but also invites them into deeper reflections about their own experiences and interpretations of meaning in a complex world.

📄 详细文档

模型信息

模型特点

Veritas-12B在哲学推理和分析方面具有显著优势，能够从多个哲学角度对问题进行深入探讨。其输出的内容逻辑严谨、条理清晰，适合用于学术研究、哲学讨论等场景。

注意事项

在使用Veritas-12B时，用户应注意其无审查的特点，避免生成不适当的内容。同时，对于简单问题，可能需要对输出进行适当调整，以使其更符合实际需求。