Veritas 12B

🚀 Veritas-12B

Veritas-12B是一款致力於追求思想清晰和邏輯嚴謹的模型。這個擁有120億參數的模型具備卓越的哲學推理能力和分析深度，非常適合用於探索複雜的倫理困境、解構論點以及進行結構化的哲學對話。Veritas-12B擅長闡述細微的立場、識別邏輯謬誤，並構建基於理性的連貫論點。其討論的特點是秉持學術誠信、進行批判性分析，並致力於精確地探索思想。

🚀 快速開始

Veritas-12B可直接用於哲學相關的文本生成任務，如分析哲學論點、探討倫理問題等。你可以通過以下方式調用該模型：

# 示例代碼，需根據實際情況調整
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer

model_name = "soob3123/Veritas-12B"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_name)

input_text = "請分析康德的道德哲學"
input_ids = tokenizer(input_text, return_tensors="pt").input_ids
output = model.generate(input_ids)
generated_text = tokenizer.decode(output[0], skip_special_tokens=True)
print(generated_text)

✨ 主要特性

• ⟡ 深度哲學探究：能夠清晰且有條理地深入探索複雜概念、倫理框架和多元哲學傳統。
• ⟡ 卓越邏輯一致性：在論證過程中嚴格遵循邏輯原則，識別不一致之處，並構建合理的思維鏈條。
• ⟡ 結構化論證分析：擅長解構複雜論證，評估前提和結論，並闡述精妙的批判或辯護觀點。
• ⟡ 細微概念闡述：能夠精確且誠實地呈現抽象思想、微妙區別和複雜的哲學術語。

⚠️ 限制與注意事項

⚠️ 重要提示

• 該模型在需要嚴謹分析、邏輯論證和哲學探索的場景中表現最佳，可能不適用於日常閒聊或純粹的創意/情感表達。
• 由於其注重分析深度，對於一些簡單問題，有時可能會給出過於正式、抽象或冗長的回答。
• 無審查模型：Veritas-12B是完全無審查的，可能會生成被認為具有冒犯性、有害、不道德或不適當的內容。用戶應謹慎使用並自行判斷。

📦 GGUFs

• Q4_0
  • 基於Gemma 3 12B QAT進行微調，Q4_0的性能預計與FP16相當。

💻 使用示例

基礎用法

以下是一個使用Veritas-12B描述圖像的示例：

Prompt :
![image/png](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/62f93f9477b722f1866398c2/Gi6bAoMHH-4IHxPHdfIOA.png)
Describe this image
### Base Gemma 3 12B
Okay, let's break down the likely meaning and context of this artwork.
What we see:
•	Dense Field of Dots: The primary element is a vast grid composed entirely of colorful dots. They are fairly uniform in size and spacing.
•	Man Gazing/Contemplating: A bald man, dressed casually (likely a jacket with a shoulder bag) stands facing the artwork. His posture suggests he's deeply engaged or lost in thought while viewing it.
•	Clean Background: The dots are on a plain white background which makes the dots pop and emphasizes their pattern.
The Artist & Context - Yayoi Kusama (Almost Certainly!)
This is overwhelmingly likely to be an artwork by Yayoi Kusama. She's world-famous for her obsession with patterns, particularly dots, and her installations often incorporate them on a massive scale.
Here’s what we can interpret from the meaning of this work within the context of Yayoi Kusama’s artistic practices:
Possible Meanings & Interpretations:
1.	Infinity and Obliteration: Kusama's art frequently explores themes of infinity, repetition, and a desire to "obliterate" the self or ego. The vast field of dots can be seen as representing this boundless nature of existence. It’s a visual embodiment of something that goes on forever, beyond human comprehension.
2.	Self-Obliteration/Merging with the Universe: Kusama has spoken about her personal experiences with mental health (including hallucinations) and how patterns help her cope. For her, covering surfaces in dots can be a way to escape from herself – to dissolve into the environment and merge with something larger than herself (the universe, nature, etc.). The man looking at the work might represent someone experiencing this process of introspection or transcendence.
3.	Pattern as Order/Chaos: Dots are simple shapes, but when multiplied in vast numbers, they can create a sense of order – a structured grid. However, the variety of colors and sheer density can also be overwhelming, suggesting chaos or an infinite array of possibilities. It’s the interplay between these two elements that Kusama often explores.
4.	The Power of Observation: The artwork encourages the viewer to really look. The dots are initially just a pattern, but the longer you gaze at it, the more nuances you might notice—different colors, subtle variations in size/spacing. This relates to her interest in perception and how our eyes/minds interpret visual information.
5.	The Individual vs. The Collective: The man standing before this immense display of dots represents an individual confronting something far larger than himself – the collective experience, the vastness of existence or a system beyond his control.
Overall Impression: This piece is evocative and contemplative. It's not about any specific narrative; it’s more about evoking feelings of awe, wonder, confusion, and perhaps even anxiety in the face of something immense and unknowable.

高級用法

以下是Veritas-12B對同一圖像進行哲學解讀的示例：

The artwork you’ve provided features a large-scale installation composed of numerous dots or circles arranged on what appears to be a white background. The varying colors suggest diversity and complexity while maintaining order through their repetition and pattern. This visual composition could evoke several philosophical interpretations, particularly drawing from the ideas of prominent philosophers such as Jean Baudrillard, Henri Bergson, and even some aspects of Kantian aesthetics.

1. Repetition and Meaning in Art (Henri Bergson)
French philosopher Henri Bergson emphasized duration—the continuous flow of time—as a fundamental aspect of experience. In this context, the repetition of circles might symbolize the idea that individual moments are part of an ongoing process or journey. Each dot could represent an instant or choice, collectively creating a narrative that resonates with life experiences. The artwork may encourage viewers to consider how these repeated elements accumulate into something meaningful over time—a metaphor for personal growth and identity formation as one navigates their own "duration."

2. Simulation Theory (Jean Baudrillard)
French theorist Jean Baudrillard, particularly in his work “Simulacra and Simulation,” argues that modern society has become so saturated with signs and images that reality is obscured by representations—simulations that do not correspond to an original or "real" state of affairs. The artwork could represent this concept; the dots might symbolize superficial layers of meaning that distract from deeper truths about existence. As the viewer stands before it, they are confronted with a pattern rather than substance—reflecting Baudrillard’s assertion that contemporary life is defined by hyperreality where media representations take precedence over actual lived experience.

3. The Aesthetic Experience (Immanuel Kant)
Drawing on Immanuel Kant's theory of aesthetics, the artwork could be seen as evoking pleasure through its arrangement and form rather than content. For Kant, aesthetic judgments involve a certain freedom from personal interests; thus, the viewer’s appreciation for the dots might stem more from their formal qualities—color combinations, symmetry, and repetition—rather than any narrative or symbolic representation they assign to them. The experience could be seen as transcendent, offering moments of pure aesthetic contemplation where one engages with beauty in a non-representational manner, aligning with Kant's notion that art can elevate human understanding beyond the constraints of practical considerations.

4. Individuality within Collective Identity
The presence of a solitary figure standing before this colorful background also invites reflection on individuality versus collective identity. This person might symbolize viewers grappling with their place in the vastness of existence, much like how we navigate social structures and personal narratives against larger patterns (like societal norms or cultural expectations). The dots may represent myriad possibilities, experiences, and identities that coexist but remain distinct—inviting us to ponder our own uniqueness within a framework of shared human experience.

In summary, this artwork can be interpreted through various philosophical lenses as it explores themes such as repetition, simulation, aesthetic appreciation, and individuality. By encouraging contemplation on these concepts, the piece engages viewers not only with its visual appeal but also invites them into deeper reflections about their own experiences and interpretations of meaning in a complex world.

📄 詳細文檔

模型信息

模型特點

Veritas-12B在哲學推理和分析方面具有顯著優勢，能夠從多個哲學角度對問題進行深入探討。其輸出的內容邏輯嚴謹、條理清晰，適合用於學術研究、哲學討論等場景。

注意事項

在使用Veritas-12B時，用戶應注意其無審查的特點，避免生成不適當的內容。同時，對於簡單問題，可能需要對輸出進行適當調整，以使其更符合實際需求。