%20--%3e%3cdefs%3e%3cstyle%3e%20.st0%20{%20fill:%20%23061b40;%20}%20.st1%20{%20fill:%20%23306af1;%20}%20.st2%20{%20fill:%20%235ce5cf;%20}%20%3c/style%3e%3c/defs%3e%3cg%3e%3cpath%20class='st0'%20d='M55,10.5h9v3h-9v9h12V7.5h-12v3ZM64,19.5h-6v-3h6v3Z'/%3e%3cpolygon%20class='st0'%20points='69%2016.5%2078%2016.5%2078%2019.5%2069%2019.5%2069%2022.5%2081%2022.5%2081%2013.5%2072%2013.5%2072%2010.5%2081%2010.5%2081%207.5%2069%207.5%2069%2016.5'/%3e%3cpolygon%20class='st0'%20points='95%2010.5%2095%207.5%2083%207.5%2083%2022.5%2095%2022.5%2095%2019.5%2086%2019.5%2086%2016.5%2095%2016.5%2095%2013.5%2086%2013.5%2086%2010.5%2095%2010.5'/%3e%3cpath%20class='st0'%20d='M40,1.5v21h11.6l1.4-1.4v-7.6h0c0,0-1.4-1.5-1.4-1.5l1.4-1.4V2.9l-1.4-1.4h-11.6ZM50,19.5h-7v-6h7v6ZM50,10.5h-7v-6h7v6Z'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cpath%20class='st1'%20d='M23.1,24L14.7,4.8l-4.9,11.2h3.8l-1.8,4H3.3L12.1,0H2C.9,0,0,.9,0,2v20c0,1.1.9,2,2,2h21.1Z'/%3e%3cpath%20class='st2'%20d='M34,0h-16.8l10.6,24h6.2c1.1,0,2-.9,2-2V2C36,.9,35.1,0,34,0ZM32.5,20h-4V4h4v16Z'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)
Claude 4 Sonnet 对比 Kimi K2
Claude 4 SonnetvsKimi K2
Claude 4 Sonnet和Kimi K2对比，哪个更胜一筹？我们讲通过比较 Claude 4 Sonnet和Kimi K2，包括模型功能、token定价、API费用、性能基准和实际能力，以帮助您选择适合您需求的LLM
选择对比：
Claude 4 Sonnet
VS
Kimi K2
Claude 4 Sonnet
平衡性能和成本的Claude 4模型，在编程、推理和通用任务中表现卓越。即将成为GitHub Copilot的基础模型，支持工具使用和200K上下文窗口。提供比Opus更好的成本效益，同时保持强大的能力。适合日常开发工作、代码审查和需要高质量AI辅助的各种专业任务。
Kimi K2
Kimi K2 是由月之暗面（Moonshot AI）发布的开源 1T 参数 MoE 架构大语言模型，主打代码生成、数学推理和 Agent 工具调用能力，支持 128K 上下文。
Claude 4 Sonnet 和 Kimi K2 基础参数对比
Claude 4 Sonnet 和 Kimi K2 定价对比
输入和输出token值费用对比
Claude 4 Sonnet 和 Kimi K2 基准测试得分对比
各种标准化测试和评估的性能指标