Roberta Base Frenk Hate
Model Overview
Model Features
Model Capabilities
Use Cases
🚀 roberta-base-frenk-hate
A text classification model based on roberta-base
, fine-tuned on the FRENK dataset for detecting LGBT and migrant hatespeech.
🚀 Quick Start
This is a text classification model built upon roberta-base
and fine-tuned on the FRENK dataset. The dataset contains LGBT and migrant hatespeech, and only the English subset was used for fine-tuning. The dataset has been relabeled for binary classification (offensive or acceptable).
✨ Features
- Based on the powerful
roberta-base
model. - Fine-tuned on a specific dataset for hate speech detection.
- Suitable for binary classification tasks of offensive and acceptable text.
📦 Installation
No specific installation steps are provided in the original document, so this section is skipped.
💻 Usage Examples
Basic Usage
from simpletransformers.classification import ClassificationModel
model_args = {
"num_train_epochs": 6,
"learning_rate": 3e-6,
"train_batch_size": 69}
model = ClassificationModel(
"roberta", "5roop/roberta-base-frenk-hate", use_cuda=True,
args=model_args
)
predictions, logit_output = model.predict(["Build the wall",
"Build the wall of trust"]
)
predictions
### Output:
### array([1, 0])
📚 Documentation
Fine-tuning hyperparameters
Fine-tuning was performed with simpletransformers
. Beforehand a brief hyperparameter optimisation was performed and the presumed optimal hyperparameters are:
model_args = {
"num_train_epochs": 6,
"learning_rate": 3e-6,
"train_batch_size": 69}
Performance
The same pipeline was run with two other transformer models and fasttext
for comparison. Accuracy and macro F1 score were recorded for each of the 6 fine-tuning sessions and post festum analyzed.
model | average accuracy | average macro F1 |
---|---|---|
roberta-base-frenk-hate | 0.7915 | 0.7785 |
xlm-roberta-large | 0.7904 | 0.77876 |
xlm-roberta-base | 0.7577 | 0.7402 |
fasttext | 0.725 | 0.707 |
From recorded accuracies and macro F1 scores p-values were also calculated:
Comparison with xlm-roberta-base
:
test | accuracy p-value | macro F1 p-value |
---|---|---|
Wilcoxon | 0.00781 | 0.00781 |
Mann Whithney U-test | 0.00108 | 0.00108 |
Student t-test | 1.35e-08 | 1.05e-07 |
Comparison with xlm-roberta-large
yielded inconclusive results. roberta-base
has average accuracy 0.7915, while xlm-roberta-large
has average accuracy of 0.7904. If macro F1 scores were to be compared, roberta-base
actually has lower average than xlm-roberta-large
: 0.77852 vs 0.77876 respectively. The same statistical tests were performed with the premise that roberta-base
has greater metrics, and the results are given below.
test | accuracy p-value | macro F1 p-value |
---|---|---|
Wilcoxon | 0.188 | 0.406 |
Mann Whithey | 0.375 | 0.649 |
Student t-test | 0.681 | 0.934 |
With reversed premise (i.e., that xlm-roberta-large
has greater statistics) the Wilcoxon p-value for macro F1 scores for this case reaches 0.656, Mann-Whithey p-value is 0.399, and of course the Student p-value stays the same. It was therefore concluded that performance of the two models are not statistically significantly different from one another.
📄 License
This project is licensed under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
📚 Citation
If you use the model, please cite the following paper on which the original model is based:
@article{DBLP:journals/corr/abs-1907-11692,
author = {Yinhan Liu and
Myle Ott and
Naman Goyal and
Jingfei Du and
Mandar Joshi and
Danqi Chen and
Omer Levy and
Mike Lewis and
Luke Zettlemoyer and
Veselin Stoyanov},
title = {RoBERTa: {A} Robustly Optimized {BERT} Pretraining Approach},
journal = {CoRR},
volume = {abs/1907.11692},
year = {2019},
url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.11692},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
eprint = {1907.11692},
timestamp = {Thu, 01 Aug 2019 08:59:33 +0200},
biburl = {https://dblp.org/rec/journals/corr/abs-1907-11692.bib},
bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}
}
and the dataset used for fine-tuning:
@misc{ljubešić2019frenk,
title={The FRENK Datasets of Socially Unacceptable Discourse in Slovene and English},
author={Nikola Ljubešić and Darja Fišer and Tomaž Erjavec},
year={2019},
eprint={1906.02045},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.02045}
}






